European Union Competition Law
European Union Competition Law
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
Skip to content
  • Menu
  • Home
    • Timeline
    • Cases
    • Flow Chart
  • Article 101
    • Concerted Practices
      • Object and Effect
  • Article 102
    • What is Dominance?
    • Deontological Implications of Holding a Dominant Position
    • What is the Purpose of Article 102?
    • What is Abuse?
    • Market Definition
    • Pricing Issues
    • Non-Pricing Issues
  • Analytical Tools
    • Horizontal and Vertical Cooperation
    • Use of Presumptions
    • Error Types
    • Evidentiary Standards
    • Burden of Proof
  • About Us
    • 2022 – 23 Team
    • 2014 – 15 Team
    • 2013 – 2014 Team
    • 2012 – 2013 Team
    • Previous Teams
    • Professor Marc Firestone
    • Contact Us
  • Archive
    • Press Release
    • CJEU Decision
    • Presumptions
    • Goals
    • Concerted Practice
    • Horizontal Information Exchange
    • Article 101 (3)
    • Guidelines
      • The Treaty
      • Protocol of the Court of Justice
      • Process of Appeal
    • EU Comp Law
      • De Minimis Standard
      • Burden Shifting
      • Per se Rules?
      • Merger Analysis

CJEU & National Courts

The T-Mobile Case and the Range of Discretionary Power of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from the National Court’s Perspective

 

Range

range 2

range 3

range 4

range 5

Search EUcomplaw

About the Project

About the Project

EUComplaw.org is a project, based at New York Law School, dedicated to offering resources to support the understanding of developing European Union competition law.

Links

  • EU Commission DG for Competition
  • Eur-Lex
  • European Union Website
  • InfoCuria
  • Netherlands Competition Authority
  • U.S. DoJ – Antitrust Division
  • U.S. FTC – Bureau of Competition
© 1997-2024 New York Law School | 185 West Broadway New York, NY 10013 | 212.431.2100 | Policies